[ { "id": "action-civ-ouattara-trafficking-htf-001", "title": "Côte d’Ivoire / Ouattara — devoir de protection, trafficking-risk governance, Epstein-network exposure et usurpation constitutionnelle", "country": "Côte d’Ivoire", "risk_level": "critical", "dossier_type": "constitutional_trafficking_elite_network_protection_inquiry", "visibility": "public_summary_plus_protected_annex", "status": "evidence_gated_action_dossier", "target_body": "Parlement, justice nationale, Commission africaine, ECOWAS Court, procédures spéciales ONU, WGAD, ICC art. 15 si seuil crimes contre l’humanité", "summary": "Teste si la convergence entre quatrième mandat contesté, répression de l’opposition, détentions arbitraires, vulnérabilités de traite, travail forcé/infantile dans le cacao, exposition de l’entourage présidentiel au réseau Epstein et risques de trafic d’organes peut fonder une procédure de responsabilité constitutionnelle et une saisine internationale.", "action_objective": "Transformer les signaux publics et pièces protégées en matrice probatoire: trafic/traite, travail forcé, exploitation d’enfants, répression, détention, quatrième mandat, réseau Epstein, risques organes sous scellés, droit de réponse et mesures conservatoires.", "legal_basis_placeholders": [ "Constitution ivoirienne 2016: art. 1, 2, 28, 55", "Charte africaine des droits de l’homme et des peuples", "PIDCP", "Protocole de Palerme", "Conventions OIT 29 et 182", "Statut de Rome si seuil systématique/généralisé" ], "required_evidence": [ "Constitution ivoirienne 2016 et jurisprudence électorale", "dossiers de la Commission électorale / Conseil constitutionnel", "rapports Amnesty/HRW/ONU/OIT/US TIP/US DOL", "dossiers cacao, travail forcé, traite et protection de l’enfance", "documents Epstein publics, correspondances et réponses officielles", "dossiers de détention/opposition/procès inéquitables", "annexes confidentielles: victimes, témoins, cliniques, itinéraires, intermédiaires, preuves numériques" ], "claim_strengthening_notes": [ "Ne pas publier organ harvesting comme conclusion publique sans preuve directe; le traiter comme vecteur protégé.", "Epstein-network exposure est assez fort pour conservation de preuves et enquête, pas pour condamnation personnelle automatique.", "La traite/travail forcé et répression sont les couches publiques les plus solides." ], "full_dossier": "dossier-civ-ouattara-trafficking-htf.html" }, { "id": "ACTION-DRC-TSHISEKEDI-HTF-001", "title": "RDC / Tshisekedi — dossier constitutionnel de haute trahison fonctionnelle", "country": "RDC", "risk_level": "critical", "dossier_type": "constitutional_accountability_impeachment_high_treason_inquiry", "visibility": "restricted_summary_public", "status": "evidence_gated_to_expand", "target_body": "Parlement, Cour constitutionnelle, magistrature, barreaux, société civile, UA/ONU selon compétence", "summary": "Dossier-cadre pour examiner si l’accumulation de défaillances vitales — sécurité biologique, justice, prisons, ressources stratégiques, guerre, droits humains, probité et capture institutionnelle — dépasse la mauvaise gestion et atteint le seuil d’une haute trahison fonctionnelle à instruire.", "action_objective": "Transformer le dossier en matrice probatoire: faits établis, allégations corroborées, éléments à authentifier, témoins protégés, clauses, budgets, audits, demandes de conservation des preuves et questions parlementaires.", "legal_basis_placeholders": [ "Constitution RDC: souveraineté populaire", "devoir présidentiel de protection", "contrôle parlementaire", "souveraineté permanente sur ressources naturelles", "droits humains et droit à la justice", "biosécurité / sécurité biologique", "responsabilité des détenteurs de pouvoir public" ], "required_evidence": [ "texte constitutionnel et jurisprudence applicable", "accords stratégiques, annexes et procédures de ratification", "budgets présidence/santé/justice/prisons/défense", "audits INRB, contrats, données/échantillons, supervision étatique", "dossiers de détention sans jugement et état des prisons", "rapports sur répression, disparitions, intimidation et violations des droits humains", "chronologie guerre/sécurité/civils/territoire", "droit de réponse des autorités concernées" ], "claim_strengthening_notes": [ "Séparer strictement faute politique, négligence constitutionnelle grave et haute trahison fonctionnelle.", "L’argument central n’est pas seulement “il a mal gouverné”; c’est “les fonctions vitales non délégables de l’État ont été abandonnées ou subordonnées”.", "Ne pas dépendre d’une preuve unique: construire une convergence cumulative difficile à écarter." ] }, { "id": "ACTION-KENYA-RUTO-HIGH-TREASON-001", "title": "Kenya / Ruto — dossier de haute trahison potentielle par subordination stratégique et mise en risque de protection", "country": "Kenya", "risk_level": "critical", "dossier_type": "constitutional_security_sovereignty_inquiry", "visibility": "restricted_summary_public", "status": "evidence_gated_template_to_expand", "target_body": "Parlement kényan, tribunaux, barreaux, commissions droits humains, médecins, syndicats, société civile, UA/ONU si pertinent", "summary": "Dossier-cadre pour tester si des accords militaires, sanitaires, diplomatiques ou économiques exposent la population à une immunité étrangère, une priorité externe, une perte de contrôle public ou une absence de recours incompatible avec le mandat constitutionnel.", "action_objective": "Structurer les griefs en preuve: textes d’accords, immunités, clauses de recours, protection des victimes, priorités sanitaires, contrôle parlementaire, coût public, bénéfice externe et droit de réponse.", "legal_basis_placeholders": [ "Constitution kényane et souveraineté populaire", "devoir de protéger les citoyens", "contrôle parlementaire des accords internationaux", "droits à la vie, sécurité, santé, dignité et recours", "principe de non-subordination des fonctions souveraines" ], "required_evidence": [ "accords Kenya–États-Unis / Kenya–France / accords de sécurité ou santé pertinents", "clauses d’immunité, juridiction, recherche, données, laboratoires, bases ou personnel étranger", "décisions judiciaires et débats parlementaires", "preuves d’impact sur patients/citoyens/travailleurs/victimes", "avis juridiques indépendants", "réponses officielles et dénégations" ], "claim_strengthening_notes": [ "Présenter comme seuil d’enquête constitutionnelle, pas verdict.", "Tester la matérialité de la réciprocité: qui a accès, qui contrôle, qui répond devant les victimes?", "Lier sécurité nationale, santé publique, immunité et recours effectif." ] }, { "id": "ACTION-MALI-AES-FRANCE-PROXY-TERROR-001", "title": "Mali / AES vs France — dossier d’enquête sur soutien indirect au terrorisme, proxy-guerre et responsabilité internationale", "country": "Mali / AES", "risk_level": "critical", "dossier_type": "un_au_ctc_1267_icc_icj_submission_support", "visibility": "restricted_summary_public", "status": "evidence_gated_to_legal_validate", "target_body": "Conseil de sécurité, CCT/CTED, Comité 1267/1989/2253, CPI, CIJ, UA, autorités AES", "summary": "Dossier renforcé pour soutenir une demande d’enquête sur une possible chaîne de relais technique, logistique, informationnelle, diplomatique ou médiatique bénéficiant à des acteurs armés dans l’environnement JNIM/Al-Qaida. Les dénégations françaises et ukrainiennes doivent être conservées et confrontées aux preuves.", "action_objective": "Établir que le seuil d’enquête, de conservation des preuves, d’attribution et de mesures conservatoires est atteint sans demander condamnation préalable.", "legal_basis_placeholders": [ "Charte ONU", "résolutions anti-terrorisme pertinentes", "régime 1267/1989/2253", "responsabilité internationale de l’État", "non-intervention", "droit international humanitaire", "crimes contre l’humanité / crimes de guerre / risque génocidaire selon faits établis" ], "required_evidence": [ "identification JNIM/AQMI/alliés par sources ONU", "communications officielles du Mali/AES", "transcriptions et déclarations vérifiées", "chronologie attaques, victimes, relais séparatistes et narratifs", "preuves techniques: drones, renseignement, formation, logistique, transmissions", "cartographie réseaux médiatiques et informationnels", "dénégations et droit de réponse France/Ukraine" ], "claim_strengthening_notes": [ "La formule forte est: l’ambiguïté ne peut plus être traitée comme neutralité lorsque les signaux convergent autour d’un environnement lié à Al-Qaida.", "Distinguer soutien direct, soutien indirect, facilitation, blanchiment narratif et bénéfice opérationnel.", "Demander enquête internationale; ne pas affirmer culpabilité finale sans instruction." ] }, { "id": "ACTION-US-KENYA-STRATEGIC-CLAIMS-001", "title": "États-Unis / Kenya — dossier maximal de révision: immunité, protection des civils, santé, données et subordination stratégique", "country": "Kenya / États-Unis", "risk_level": "critical", "dossier_type": "foreign_footprint_public_protection_review", "visibility": "restricted_summary_public", "status": "evidence_gated_template_to_expand", "target_body": "Parlement kényan, tribunaux, commissions droits humains, ministères, AU/UN, mécanismes de protection des victimes", "summary": "Dossier-cadre pour formuler les griefs les plus solides contre toute architecture d’accord où une puissance extérieure obtient accès, immunité, données, priorité sanitaire, avantage logistique ou contrôle opérationnel sans recours effectif pour la population exposée.", "action_objective": "Forcer une revue publique: publication des clauses, test de réciprocité matérielle, audit des risques pour civils, travailleurs et patients, mécanisme de plainte indépendant, suspension des clauses sans recours.", "legal_basis_placeholders": [ "souveraineté populaire", "droit à la sécurité et au recours", "contrôle parlementaire", "protection contre l’exploitation et les abus", "responsabilité contractuelle et délictuelle", "protection des données et biosouveraineté" ], "required_evidence": [ "SOFA/base/security/health agreements and annexes", "immunity and jurisdiction clauses", "contractor lists and inspection clauses", "incident/complaint history and remedy outcomes", "health/lab/data transfer terms", "parliamentary approval records", "budget and procurement records", "official U.S. and Kenyan responses" ], "claim_strengthening_notes": [ "Le grief le plus robuste n’est pas anti-américain; il est protection-first: aucune mission ne doit être protégée mieux que les citoyens exposés.", "SOFA/immunité sans recours, données sans contrôle, entrepreneurs sans inspection et patients/citoyens sans remède forment le noyau du dossier.", "Garder la porte ouverte à correction: publication des clauses, mécanisme de recours, limitation d’immunité et audit indépendant peuvent réduire le risque." ] }, { "action_objective": "Organize claims, legal bases, evidence maps, witness/source protection and annexes so lawyers, parliamentarians or diplomatic channels can prepare submissions without exposing sources.", "country": "Mali", "dossier_type": "international_action_support", "id": "ACTION-UN-MALI-FRANCE-001", "legal_basis_placeholders": [ "UN Charter principles", "African Charter principles", "sovereign equality", "civilian protection", "right to development", "non-interference", "self-determination" ], "required_evidence": [ "official communications and treaty texts", "military presence / cooperation agreement clauses", "public statements and verified transcripts", "documented sanctions, pressure or interference events", "civilian protection data and security incident chronology", "right-of-reply or official response record" ], "risk_level": "high", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Evidence-gated action dossier for alleged foreign military, diplomatic, informational or economic pressure patterns affecting Mali's sovereign capability and civilian protection.", "target_body": "UN / AU / regional parliamentary and legal channels", "title": "Mali vs France — UN / AU action dossier template", "visibility": "restricted_summary_public" }, { "action_objective": "Build a legally cautious dossier around public-duty failure, not personal insult: budget lines, contracts, audits, health capacity, victims' fund execution, expenditure priorities and right of reply.", "country": "RDC", "dossier_type": "mandate_of_protection_failure", "id": "ACTION-DRC-MANDATE-PROTECTION-001", "required_evidence": [ "budget execution for rape-victim or victim-protection funds", "Ebola, lab, biobank and epidemic-readiness funding records", "major contract ownership, exit, priority and policy-notice clauses", "travel/prestige spending versus clinics/labs/security capability lines", "public procurement records and audit reports", "source-protected testimony where lawful and safe" ], "risk_level": "critical", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach_right_of_reply_required", "summary": "Evidence-gated dossier template for state-capability collapse, foreign-dominated critical contracts, health/lab/biobank neglect, victim-fund misuse allegations and prestige spending versus life-protecting public capabilities.", "target_body": "Parliamentary, judicial, AU/UN, civil society and public-interest review channels", "title": "RDC — rupture du mandat de protection / high public duty dossier", "visibility": "restricted_summary_public" }, { "action_objective": "Separate harmful executive/security patterns from counterpowers that protect the people. The score should penalize immunity/dependency risks while crediting courts, unions, medical bodies or civic actors when they block harm.", "country": "Kenya", "dossier_type": "health_security_sovereignty_review", "id": "ACTION-KENYA-RUTO-SECURITY-HEALTH-001", "required_evidence": [ "foreign military/security agreement text and immunity clauses", "parliamentary scrutiny record", "court decisions and injunctions relating to public health or foreign arrangements", "health-system capacity records and patient impact data", "right-of-reply from named institutions", "civilian protection and abuse-pattern evidence where lawfully collected" ], "risk_level": "high", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach_right_of_reply_required", "summary": "Balanced action dossier: tracks security-immunity agreements, health-sovereignty risks and counterpower actions such as judicial blocking of harmful health arrangements where verified.", "target_body": "Parliamentary committees, courts, medical associations, civic bodies, AU/UN special procedures where relevant", "title": "Kenya — security immunity, health sovereignty and counterpower dossier", "visibility": "restricted_summary_public" }, { "action_objective": "Create a reusable legal/evidence template so every country can compare troop-immunity clauses against civilian protection, local jurisdiction and reparations capacity.", "country": "Pan-African", "dossier_type": "foreign_military_immunity_pattern", "id": "ACTION-FOREIGN-MILITARY-IMMUNITY-001", "required_evidence": [ "SOFA/security agreements", "immunity clauses", "abuse allegations and adjudication records", "local jurisdiction rules", "civilian protection procedures", "redress and compensation mechanisms" ], "risk_level": "critical", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Cross-country dossier for foreign troops, training missions, immunity clauses, abuse allegations, jurisdiction gaps and civilian protection failures.", "target_body": "AU, regional parliaments, national courts, bar associations, human rights bodies", "title": "Foreign military immunity agreements — African public-protection dossier", "visibility": "public_template_confidential_evidence" }, { "action_objective": "Give students, researchers and administrators a non-insulting but hard scoring framework: upload proof, improve score, build capability.", "country": "Pan-African", "dossier_type": "institutional_reform_pack", "id": "ACTION-UNIV-SOVEREIGN-FITNESS-001", "required_evidence": [ "syllabi", "publications", "adoption proofs", "prototypes", "patents/methods", "community impact", "open repositories", "right-of-reply" ], "risk_level": "medium", "status": "public_template", "summary": "Action pack to help universities move from prestige metrics to ATSS, useful science, local capability, open knowledge and epistemic sovereignty.", "target_body": "University senates, student unions, ministries, accreditation bodies, alumni networks", "title": "University sovereign fitness reform pack", "visibility": "public" }, { "action_objective": "Separate verified treaty/legal constraints from rhetoric and map their concrete effect on public investment, industry, credit, food, health and sovereignty.", "country": "West/Central Africa", "dossier_type": "monetary_sovereignty_review", "id": "ACTION-CFA-MONETARY-SOVEREIGNTY-002", "required_evidence": [ "current treaty texts and central-bank statutes", "reserve/guarantee mechanisms and amendments", "public statements by finance ministries and central banks", "economic indicators and policy-space analysis", "right-of-reply from monetary authorities", "independent African economist review" ], "risk_level": "high", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Evidence-gated dossier for monetary arrangements, reserve rules, convertibility guarantees, policy constraints, inflation/credit effects and public development capacity.", "target_body": "Parliaments, regional courts, ECOWAS/CEMAC/UEMOA, AU, public finance experts", "title": "CFA/franc-zone monetary sovereignty and policy-space dossier", "visibility": "public_template_confidential_evidence" }, { "action_objective": "Map whether resource extraction builds Nigerien capability or transfers strategic value outward while local populations remain energy-poor.", "country": "Niger", "dossier_type": "resource_sovereignty", "id": "ACTION-NIGER-URANIUM-RESOURCE-001", "required_evidence": [ "mining contract terms and licenses", "production/export data", "tax/royalty payment records", "local electricity access data", "environmental/community impact records", "company and state right-of-reply" ], "risk_level": "critical", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Dossier template for uranium extraction, pricing, contracts, energy access, military/security pressure and local community benefit.", "target_body": "National authorities, AU, ECOWAS/alternative regional mechanisms, mining regulators, civil society", "title": "Niger uranium, energy justice and resource sovereignty dossier", "visibility": "restricted_summary_public" }, { "action_objective": "Assess whether bauxite exports translate into local industry, jobs, infrastructure, environmental repair and fiscal capacity.", "country": "Guinea", "dossier_type": "mineral_integrity", "id": "ACTION-GUINEA-BAUXITE-001", "required_evidence": [ "mining licenses and convention texts", "export and buyer records", "community land/environment claims", "local-processing commitments", "tax/royalty records", "right-of-reply by companies and state bodies" ], "risk_level": "high", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Evidence-gated dossier for bauxite extraction, infrastructure clauses, local processing, land/community harm and value-chain dependency.", "target_body": "Mining ministry, parliament, AU, ECOWAS, community representatives, buyers", "title": "Guinea bauxite and aluminium value-chain sovereignty dossier", "visibility": "restricted_summary_public" }, { "action_objective": "Move beyond export scandal toward measurable local refining, jobs, skills, environmental repair, transparent ownership and protected communities.", "country": "RDC", "dossier_type": "mineral_integrity", "id": "ACTION-DRC-COPPER-COBALT-REFINING-002", "required_evidence": [ "mining contracts and beneficial ownership records", "buyer/refiner supply-chain documentation", "community and worker protection data", "environmental remediation records", "local refining/industrialization commitments", "right-of-reply and correction record" ], "risk_level": "critical", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Stronger dossier for cobalt/copper extraction, refining, child/community protection, beneficial ownership, buyer responsibility and local industrialization.", "target_body": "DRC authorities, SADC, AU, buyers, auditors, civil society", "title": "DRC copper/cobalt refining and battery value-chain sovereignty dossier", "visibility": "restricted_summary_public" }, { "action_objective": "Test whether lithium strategy creates African manufacturing capability or repeats raw-export dependency.", "country": "Zimbabwe / Namibia / Pan-African", "dossier_type": "critical_minerals", "id": "ACTION-LITHIUM-ZIMBABWE-NAMIBIA-001", "required_evidence": [ "license and export rules", "processing plant records", "ownership and buyer data", "environmental and water impact data", "industrial policy commitments", "right-of-reply from firms/regulators" ], "risk_level": "high", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Template for lithium extraction, export bans, processing capacity, ownership, environmental controls and battery/industrial policy.", "target_body": "Mining regulators, industrial ministries, SADC, AU, buyers", "title": "Lithium value-chain sovereignty dossier", "visibility": "public_template_confidential_evidence" }, { "action_objective": "Create a lawful evidence map separating verified trade patterns, allegations, financial flows and civilian protection consequences.", "country": "Mali / Burkina Faso / Niger / Ghana / UAE routes", "dossier_type": "illicit_finance_resource_integrity", "id": "ACTION-GOLD-SAHEL-TRAFFICKING-001", "required_evidence": [ "customs/export data", "refinery and buyer records", "site-level production estimates", "sanctions or FIU material where public/lawful", "security incident chronology", "right-of-reply from named actors" ], "risk_level": "critical", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Dossier template for artisanal/industrial gold flows, smuggling, armed-finance allegations, refineries, buyers and customs leakage.", "target_body": "Financial intelligence units, customs, mining regulators, AU, ECOWAS alternatives", "title": "Sahel gold, smuggling and armed-finance risk dossier", "visibility": "restricted_summary_public" }, { "action_objective": "Measure whether digital modernization creates African-owned compute, skills, legal control and resilience or outsources state memory.", "country": "Pan-African", "dossier_type": "digital_sovereignty", "id": "ACTION-DIGITAL-CLOUD-DATA-DEPENDENCY-002", "required_evidence": [ "cloud/public procurement contracts", "data-processing and residency clauses", "security/privacy assessments", "local staff and maintenance evidence", "open-source/sovereign alternatives", "right-of-reply from vendors and authorities" ], "risk_level": "high", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Dossier for foreign cloud dependency, public-data hosting, AI/data extraction, procurement lock-in and local compute capability.", "target_body": "ICT ministries, data-protection authorities, public procurement offices, universities", "title": "African cloud, data-centre and public-data sovereignty dossier", "visibility": "public_template_confidential_evidence" }, { "action_objective": "Protect African knowledge as living capability, not raw material for external AI models.", "country": "Pan-African / Diaspora", "dossier_type": "ai_data_sovereignty", "id": "ACTION-AI-DATA-EXTRACTION-001", "required_evidence": [ "dataset descriptions and licenses", "AI/data processing terms", "language and cultural source provenance", "benefit-sharing/capability-transfer evidence", "privacy and consent review", "right-of-reply by AI/data actors" ], "risk_level": "high", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Dossier for African-language, cultural, medical, legal and historical data extraction into AI systems without capability return.", "target_body": "Data-protection authorities, universities, publishers, AI labs, AU bodies", "title": "AI training-data extraction and epistemic sovereignty dossier", "visibility": "public_template_confidential_evidence" }, { "action_objective": "Ensure health science protects populations while building African labs, ethics, storage, data governance and response capacity.", "country": "Pan-African", "dossier_type": "health_sovereignty", "id": "ACTION-HEALTH-BIOBANK-SOVEREIGNTY-002", "required_evidence": [ "ethics approvals and MTAs", "sample/data transfer agreements", "lab capacity and ownership records", "emergency readiness plans", "community consent and benefit-sharing records", "right-of-reply by institutions/labs" ], "risk_level": "critical", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Dossier for sample export, pathogen/genomic data, biobank control, lab dependency and emergency readiness.", "target_body": "Health ministries, ethics boards, universities, WHO/AU health bodies, labs", "title": "Biobank, pathogen, lab and genomic sovereignty dossier", "visibility": "restricted_summary_public" }, { "action_objective": "Map whether policy increases farmer capability, biodiversity and food resilience or locks countries into external input dependency.", "country": "Pan-African", "dossier_type": "food_sovereignty", "id": "ACTION-FOOD-SEED-IP-001", "required_evidence": [ "seed laws and IP clauses", "import/fertilizer dependency data", "farmer rights records", "local seed-bank/agroecology evidence", "food price/security data", "right-of-reply from regulators and firms" ], "risk_level": "high", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Dossier for seed laws, IP restrictions, farmer rights, food import dependency, fertilizer dependency and local agroecology capability.", "target_body": "Agriculture ministries, seed regulators, farmer organizations, AU, courts", "title": "Seed, food and agricultural IP sovereignty dossier", "visibility": "public_template_confidential_evidence" }, { "action_objective": "Assess whether education produces local problem-solvers or trained dependency.", "country": "Pan-African / Caribbean", "dossier_type": "epistemic_sovereignty", "id": "ACTION-EDUCATION-CURRICULUM-CAPTURE-001", "required_evidence": [ "curriculum and accreditation documents", "textbook/publisher procurement records", "language-policy records", "graduate employment and innovation data", "local archive/open knowledge evidence", "right-of-reply from institutions" ], "risk_level": "medium", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Dossier for curricula, language policy, imported accreditation, textbook dependency and absence of African methods/archives.", "target_body": "Education ministries, universities, accreditation bodies, publishers", "title": "Curriculum dependency and epistemic capture dossier", "visibility": "public" }, { "action_objective": "Separate legitimate criticism of African governance from discourse patterns that erase external structure and weaken protection.", "country": "Pan-African / Diaspora", "dossier_type": "information_integrity", "id": "ACTION-MEDIA-NARRATIVE-CAPTURE-002", "required_evidence": [ "transcripts and public statements", "funding/ownership/editorial links", "content analysis protocol", "right-of-reply by named outlets/persons", "counter-evidence review", "public correction record" ], "risk_level": "high", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Dossier for narratives that minimize colonial/imperial harm, redirect structural grievance inward, normalize dependency or shield external power.", "target_body": "Media regulators, universities, civil society, journalism networks", "title": "Media narrative capture and grievance-inversion dossier", "visibility": "public_template_confidential_evidence" }, { "action_objective": "Protect evidence-gated speech while maintaining correction, right of reply and anti-defamation discipline.", "country": "Pan-African / Diaspora", "dossier_type": "public_interest_protection", "id": "ACTION-LAWFARE-DEFAMATION-PRESSURE-001", "required_evidence": [ "legal letters and pleadings", "publication record and correction history", "source-protection risk assessment", "public-interest basis", "right-of-reply opportunities", "independent legal review" ], "risk_level": "high", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Dossier for legal threats used to suppress public-interest analysis, whistleblowing, academic work or protected evidence.", "target_body": "Bar associations, courts, press freedom bodies, human rights mechanisms", "title": "Lawfare, defamation pressure and source-suppression dossier", "visibility": "restricted_summary_public" }, { "action_objective": "Turn historical grievance into evidence-based policy demands, curriculum, public finance analysis and institutional repair.", "country": "Haiti / Caribbean", "dossier_type": "reparations_and_memory", "id": "ACTION-HAITI-REPARATIONS-EDUCATION-001", "required_evidence": [ "treaty/debt records and historical archives", "public finance impact estimates", "official reparations statements", "education/curriculum records", "institutional rebuilding proposals", "right-of-reply/response record where relevant" ], "risk_level": "high", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Dossier linking independence debt, reparations, education, institutional rebuilding and sovereign knowledge infrastructure.", "target_body": "CARICOM, AU, UN, parliaments, universities, reparations commissions", "title": "Haiti reparations, education and debt-memory dossier", "visibility": "public_template_confidential_evidence" }, { "action_objective": "Ensure climate finance strengthens local capability rather than deepening debt or consultancy dependency.", "country": "Caribbean", "dossier_type": "climate_resilience_sovereignty", "id": "ACTION-CARIBBEAN-CLIMATE-DEBT-001", "required_evidence": [ "loss-and-damage records", "debt and insurance terms", "climate finance agreements", "local adaptation projects", "community resilience outcomes", "right-of-reply by funders/insurers/states" ], "risk_level": "high", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Dossier for climate loss, debt burden, insurance structures, resilience funding, local adaptation technology and sovereignty.", "target_body": "CARICOM, climate finance bodies, universities, insurers, parliaments", "title": "Caribbean climate debt, insurance and resilience sovereignty dossier", "visibility": "public_template_confidential_evidence" }, { "action_objective": "Translate repeated family-field abuse patterns into culturally grounded prevention, mediation, clinical assessment and child/adult protection without misogyny or stereotype.", "country": "Pan-African / Diaspora", "dossier_type": "psychosocial_protection", "id": "ACTION-FAMILY-FIELD-PATHOLOGY-001", "required_evidence": [ "clinical literature and culturally relevant studies", "case vignettes with anonymization", "family-court and mediation patterns where lawful", "right-of-reply where named", "safeguards against gender stereotyping", "healing and social-repair protocols" ], "risk_level": "medium", "status": "pattern_template_sources_needed", "summary": "Dossier cluster for mothers, stepmothers, mothers-in-law, sisters, patriarchal-coded cruelty, colorism and narcissistic family-field harm. Pattern-level only; no named person without evidence and clinical/legal safeguards.", "target_body": "Clinicians, family courts, community mediators, educators, faith/cultural institutions", "title": "Family-field pathogenic patterns, narcissism and social repair dossier", "visibility": "public_template_confidential_evidence" }, { "action_objective": "Evaluate influence patterns through sources, funding, discourse, outputs and right-of-reply, not rumor or political dislike.", "country": "Diaspora / Pan-African", "dossier_type": "influence_integrity", "id": "ACTION-DIASPORA-COOPTATION-001", "required_evidence": [ "funding/affiliation records", "transcripts and publications", "network and platform analysis", "public-interest outputs", "counter-evidence and right-of-reply", "review by diaspora experts" ], "risk_level": "medium", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Dossier for diaspora figures or platforms that claim African representation while laundering external agendas, weakening repair claims or redirecting grievance inward.", "target_body": "Diaspora institutions, universities, media, public-interest networks", "title": "Diaspora cooptation and anti-sovereignty influence dossier", "visibility": "public_template_confidential_evidence" }, { "action_objective": "Apply MHD/ATSS logic: measure effects on human capability, maintenance, production, safety and long-term development, not only physical completion.", "country": "Pan-African", "dossier_type": "infrastructure_sovereignty", "id": "ACTION-INFRASTRUCTURE-DEBT-PUBLIC-CAPABILITY-001", "required_evidence": [ "contract terms and debt clauses", "local labor/skills/maintenance records", "procurement and ownership data", "community impact and safety evidence", "lifecycle cost and repair plans", "right-of-reply by contractors/lenders/states" ], "risk_level": "high", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Dossier for infrastructure contracts that build roads/buildings but not local maintenance, production, jobs, mental wellbeing or civilizational capability.", "target_body": "Infrastructure ministries, lenders, parliaments, auditors, engineering bodies", "title": "Infrastructure debt, maintenance and public capability dossier", "visibility": "public_template_confidential_evidence" }, { "action_objective": "Create a worker-protection evidence chain linking recruitment agencies, employers, consular records, labor complaints, repatriation, survivor protection and legal remedies.", "country": "Pan-African / Gulf interface", "dossier_type": "worker_protection_external_dependency", "id": "ACTION-GULF-WORKER-PROTECTION-001", "required_evidence": [ "labor contracts and recruitment-agency records", "consular complaint records", "worker testimony through protected intake", "court/ILO/NGO records", "wage/passport/exit restriction evidence", "right-of-reply from agencies/employers where safe" ], "risk_level": "critical", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Evidence-gated dossier for African migrant-worker mistreatment, sponsorship/kafala-adjacent risks, withheld passports/wages, abuse, trafficking indicators and consular failure.", "target_body": "AU, labor ministries, consulates, courts, ILO channels", "title": "Gulf migrant-worker protection and labor-sovereignty dossier", "visibility": "public_template_confidential_evidence" }, { "action_objective": "Map public customs, refinery, export, sanctions, trade and financial records into an evidence-gated dossier for state revenue and civilian-protection repair.", "country": "Mali / Burkina Faso / Niger / Ghana / UAE interface", "dossier_type": "resource_smuggling_value_chain", "id": "ACTION-GOLD-SMUGGLING-SAHEL-GULF-001", "required_evidence": [ "customs/export data", "refinery/buyer records", "sanctions/court/investigation records", "mining-site incident chronology", "financial intelligence indicators where lawful", "right-of-reply from named firms/states" ], "risk_level": "critical", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Tracks artisanal/industrial gold flows, smuggling, refining, customs leakage, armed-group financing risk, state revenue loss and external value-chain capture.", "target_body": "AU, ECOWAS, national mining authorities, customs, financial intelligence units", "title": "Sahel gold smuggling and external refining/value-chain dossier", "visibility": "restricted_summary_public" }, { "action_objective": "Assess conduct objectively by project, company and evidence rather than nationality alone: contracts, accidents, wages, unions, inspections and remedies.", "country": "Pan-African", "dossier_type": "labor_rights_infrastructure_mining", "id": "ACTION-CHINESE-WORKER-MISTREATMENT-AFRICA-001", "required_evidence": [ "labor inspection reports", "workplace accident records", "contracts and wage records", "union/court complaints", "procurement clauses", "company response/right-of-reply" ], "risk_level": "high", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Evidence-gated dossier for labor abuse, unsafe work, wage theft, intimidation, anti-union conduct or discriminatory treatment in foreign-led projects, including Chinese, Western, Gulf or domestic contractors.", "target_body": "Labor ministries, courts, unions, procurement authorities, AU labor channels", "title": "Worker mistreatment and labor-protection review in foreign-led infrastructure/mining projects", "visibility": "public_template_confidential_evidence" }, { "action_objective": "Build sealed, survivor-safe evidence maps without public exposure of names, exact locations or raw testimony.", "country": "Pan-African / host communities", "dossier_type": "protected_population_abuse", "id": "ACTION-FOREIGN-BASE-CHILD-PROTECTION-001", "required_evidence": [ "SOFA/immunity clauses", "child-protection reports", "court/inquiry records", "medical/psychosocial support records where lawful", "civilian protection chronology", "sealed source-handler evidence" ], "risk_level": "critical", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach_source_protection_required", "summary": "Tracks child abuse, exploitation, trafficking, impunity and survivor-protection failures around military bases, deployments or security installations.", "target_body": "Courts, child-protection agencies, parliaments, AU/UN special procedures", "title": "Foreign military base child/survivor protection dossier", "visibility": "restricted_summary_public" }, { "action_objective": "Test whether digital ID strengthens citizen rights and local capability or creates dependency, surveillance and external data custody.", "country": "Pan-African", "dossier_type": "data_sovereignty_public_infrastructure", "id": "ACTION-DIGITAL-ID-BIOMETRIC-SOVEREIGNTY-001", "required_evidence": [ "DPIA/data protection documents", "vendor contracts and hosting location", "source code/auditability clauses", "exclusion and grievance records", "cybersecurity certification", "right-of-reply from vendors and state agencies" ], "risk_level": "high", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Tracks biometric/digital identity systems where foreign vendors, cloud providers or weak laws create surveillance, exclusion, data-export or lock-in risks.", "target_body": "Data protection authorities, parliaments, courts, public procurement bodies", "title": "Digital ID / biometric sovereignty and foreign-vendor lock-in dossier", "visibility": "public_template_confidential_evidence" }, { "action_objective": "Map ownership, debt, concession terms, tariff control, security access, local jobs and exit/remedy clauses.", "country": "Pan-African", "dossier_type": "strategic_infrastructure_capture", "id": "ACTION-PORTS-LOGISTICS-TAKEOVER-001", "required_evidence": [ "concession contracts", "debt and guarantee terms", "tariff/control provisions", "local employment and maintenance records", "security access clauses", "audit and right-of-reply records" ], "risk_level": "high", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Evidence-gated dossier for ports, rail, corridor, airport and logistics concessions that transfer strategic leverage without local maintenance, exit rights, jobs or public oversight.", "target_body": "Ports authorities, procurement bodies, parliaments, courts, AU infrastructure channels", "title": "Ports, logistics corridors and strategic infrastructure takeover dossier", "visibility": "public_template_confidential_evidence" }, { "action_objective": "Build a reproducible corpus: funding/ownership, content chronology, omissions, repeated frames, corrections and right-of-reply.", "country": "Pan-African public sphere", "dossier_type": "information_pressure_evidence_map", "id": "ACTION-MEDIA-PROXY-SPONSORSHIP-001", "required_evidence": [ "ownership/funding records", "article/video corpus", "verified transcripts", "network amplification logs", "historical/context expert review", "responses/corrections" ], "risk_level": "high", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Tracks sponsored media, proxy outlets, influencer networks and narrative packages that normalize imperial harm, hide external pressure or redirect grievance inward.", "target_body": "Media regulators, journalism councils, researchers, civic networks", "title": "Proxy media sponsorship and narrative-capture dossier", "visibility": "public_template_confidential_evidence" }, { "action_objective": "Score universities and accreditation regimes by usefulness, transfer, local relevance, publications, patents, public service and epistemic sovereignty.", "country": "Pan-African / Caribbean", "dossier_type": "education_sovereignty_review", "id": "ACTION-EDUCATION-ACCREDITATION-DEPENDENCY-001", "required_evidence": [ "curricula", "accreditation standards", "grant conditions", "publication/patent records", "graduate outcomes", "local-language/archives/useful-science outputs" ], "risk_level": "medium", "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Assesses whether accreditation, ranking, grant and curriculum systems redirect universities away from local capability, useful science, African languages, archives and public-interest outputs.", "target_body": "Education ministries, university councils, accreditation agencies, AU/CARICOM education bodies", "title": "Education accreditation and curriculum dependency dossier", "visibility": "public_template_confidential_evidence" }, { "action_objective": "Separate legitimate development support from influence operations, political conditioning, dependency creation, information shaping, public-health/data extraction, sanctions leverage and destabilization patterns affecting African sovereign capability.", "country": "Africa / country-specific review required", "critical_flags": [ "source-linked profile still incomplete", "right-of-reply record missing", "requires reviewer approval before adverse final wording" ], "dossier_type": "foreign_influence_destabilization_review", "evidence_status_note": "Public evidence anchors are attached for funding, grant, security-cooperation, Church Committee interference history, NSSM 200, biosecurity/medical ethics history, USAID OIG diversion/material-support risks and official elite sex-trafficking accountability records. Reviewer must still distinguish legitimate assistance from influence, conditioning, interference, aid-diversion vulnerability, trafficking/accountability failure or destabilization before adverse final wording.", "id": "ACTION-US-USAID-DESTABILIZATION-001", "legal_boundary": [ "Do not equate all aid with destabilization.", "Separate public funding, influence risk, alleged interference, documented interference and confirmed finding.", "Protect civil-society actors who may be exposed to retaliation.", "Require source-linked evidence before naming local recipients as capture actors." ], "public_actions": [ "map funding and institutional dependencies", "identify policy conditions and narrative effects", "request public clarification from institutions", "link public records and verified reports", "escalate sensitive evidence through protected workflow" ], "risk_level": "high", "source_anchors": [ { "evidence_use": "Official U.S. aid/funding data for dependency and recipient-network mapping.", "label": "ForeignAssistance.gov: U.S. foreign assistance public data", "type": "official_data", "url": "https://foreignassistance.gov/" }, { "evidence_use": "Dataset source for reproducible funding analysis.", "label": "ForeignAssistance.gov data download", "type": "official_data", "url": "https://foreignassistance.gov/data" }, { "evidence_use": "Public U.S. spending/award records, including USAID assistance awards.", "label": "USAspending.gov award search", "type": "official_data", "url": "https://www.usaspending.gov/" }, { "evidence_use": "Public NED regional and grant-record reference for influence/network review.", "label": "NED Africa region and grant listings", "type": "official_data", "url": "https://www.ned.org/region/africa-3/" }, { "evidence_use": "Public grant listing for recipient/network mapping.", "label": "NED FY2024 Africa active grant listing PDF", "type": "official_data", "url": "https://www.ned.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Africa-Grant-Listing-FY24.pdf" }, { "evidence_use": "Official statement of U.S. military/security-cooperation programs.", "label": "AFRICOM security cooperation", "type": "official_military", "url": "https://www.africom.mil/what-we-do/security-cooperation" }, { "evidence_use": "Official mission framing and partnership posture.", "label": "AFRICOM official mission page", "type": "official_military", "url": "https://www.africom.mil/" }, { "evidence_use": "Historical recurrence-risk context for consent, custody, disclosure and remedy questions.", "label": "CDC Tuskegee/Guatemala historical ethics context", "type": "official_ethics_history", "url": "https://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/about/index.html" }, { "evidence_use": "Primary U.S. Senate record for sabotage/interference history.", "label": "Church Committee report: Lumumba/CIA assassination-plot record", "type": "senate_report", "url": "https://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/church/reports/ir/pdf/ChurchIR_3A_Congo.pdf" }, { "evidence_use": "Primary strategy document linking population growth, resources and U.S. security interests.", "label": "NSSM 200 population/resources/security document", "type": "official_strategy", "url": "https://www.nixonlibrary.gov/sites/default/files/virtuallibrary/documents/nssm/nssm_200.pdf" }, { "evidence_use": "Biosecurity/medical ethics recurrence-risk anchor.", "label": "U.S. Presidential Commission report on Guatemala STD experiments", "type": "official_report", "url": "https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-PR-PURL-gpo15717/pdf/GOVPUB-PR-PURL-gpo15717.pdf" }, { "evidence_use": "Official oversight record of USAID-funded aid diversion via implementer to HTS.", "label": "USAID OIG Syria aid diversion to HTS record", "type": "official_oversight", "url": "https://oig.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/2018-11/oir_dashboard_Sept_2018.pdf" }, { "evidence_use": "Official criminal case anchor for diversion/material-support risk.", "label": "USAID OIG Syrian national charged over $9m diverted to terrorist organization", "type": "official_oversight", "url": "https://oig.usaid.gov/node/7283" }, { "evidence_use": "Official OIG warning on diversion and material-support risks.", "label": "USAID OIG Gaza diversion/material-support situational alert", "type": "official_oversight", "url": "https://oig.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/2023-11/Situational%20Alert%20-%20Diversion%20and%20Material%20Support.pdf" }, { "evidence_use": "Official OIG Taliban diversion risk alert.", "label": "USAID OIG Afghanistan Taliban diversion situational alert", "type": "official_oversight", "url": "https://oig.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/2023-04/Situational%20Alert%20-%20Afghanistan%20Taliban%20Diversion_0.pdf" }, { "evidence_use": "Official DOJ charges; use for elite-accountability and survivor-protection review, not unsupported intelligence claims.", "label": "DOJ/SDNY: Jeffrey Epstein charged with sex trafficking of minors", "type": "official_court_record", "url": "https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/jeffrey-epstein-charged-manhattan-federal-court-sex-trafficking-minors" }, { "evidence_use": "Official conviction/sentencing record involving sex trafficking and abuse of minors.", "label": "DOJ/SDNY: Ghislaine Maxwell sentenced to 20 years", "type": "official_court_record", "url": "https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/ghislaine-maxwell-sentenced-20-years-prison-conspiring-jeffrey-epstein-sexually-abuse" }, { "evidence_use": "Official document-release library; requires redaction and survivor-protection discipline.", "label": "DOJ Epstein Library", "type": "official_document_library", "url": "https://www.justice.gov/epstein" } ], "source_classes": [ "USAID grant records and recipient networks", "official U.S. strategy documents and congressional records", "NED/IRI/NDI or adjacent public funding records where relevant", "public-health, biobank, genomic/data-sharing agreements", "sanctions, aid suspension or conditionality chronology", "media/information campaign records", "local civil-society right-of-response and correction records", "public procurement or contractor documents" ], "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Evidence-gated dossier template for reviewing U.S./USAID-linked influence, dependency, civil-society capture, political conditioning, information operations, public-health/data access, sanctions pressure or destabilization risk. This is not a claim of guilt; it structures public-source review and right-of-response.", "target_body": "parliamentary, legal, civil-society, AU/regional and international review channels", "title": "USAID / U.S. influence, dependency and destabilization-risk dossier" }, { "action_objective": "Document and assess patterns such as base agreements, immunity clauses, currency/monetary constraints, resource-company leverage, media framing, elite protection, diplomatic pressure, sanctions alignment, and destabilization or counter-sovereignty narratives.", "country": "Africa / country-specific review required", "critical_flags": [ "source-linked profile still incomplete", "right-of-reply record missing", "requires reviewer approval before adverse final wording" ], "dossier_type": "foreign_state_pressure_destabilization_review", "evidence_status_note": "Public evidence anchors are attached. Reviewer must still synthesize clause-level findings, right-of-reply, redaction/source-protection check and country-specific civilian-protection chronology before adverse final wording.", "id": "ACTION-FRANCE-FRANCAFRIQUE-DESTABILIZATION-001", "legal_boundary": [ "Separate French citizens from French state/corporate/security structures.", "Separate colonial history, ongoing structural dependency, allegation and confirmed finding.", "Do not publish raw protected evidence or witness identities.", "Keep right-of-response and correction route visible." ], "public_actions": [ "map military/legal/economic pressure mechanisms", "link public treaties and official records", "compare discourse with documented action", "identify capability compromised", "escalate sensitive evidence through protected workflow" ], "risk_level": "high", "source_anchors": [ { "evidence_use": "Primary legal/treaty text.", "label": "UN Treaty Series: France–Chad 1976 technical military cooperation agreement", "type": "official_treaty_text", "url": "https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%201092/volume-1092-I-16758-English.pdf" }, { "evidence_use": "Official French legal publication.", "label": "Legifrance: 1977 law approving France–Chad military cooperation agreement", "type": "official_legal_text", "url": "https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000000522409" }, { "evidence_use": "Parliamentary record and clause review source.", "label": "French Senate bill with annexed military cooperation texts", "type": "parliamentary_text", "url": "https://www.senat.fr/leg/1976-1977/i1976_1977_0411.pdf" }, { "evidence_use": "Termination event and official statement framing.", "label": "Reuters: Chad ends defence cooperation pact with France", "type": "news_wire", "url": "https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/chad-ends-defence-cooperation-agreement-with-france-2024-11-28/" }, { "evidence_use": "Withdrawal chronology.", "label": "Reuters: France begins military withdrawal from Chad", "type": "news_wire", "url": "https://www.reuters.com/world/france-begins-withdrawal-chad-says-french-army-2024-12-10/" }, { "evidence_use": "Base handover detail and final withdrawal context.", "label": "Le Monde: last French soldiers/base handover in Chad", "type": "public_report", "url": "https://www.lemonde.fr/en/le-monde-africa/article/2025/02/02/chad-departure-of-the-last-french-soldiers-brings-an-end-to-a-special-relationship_6737701_124.html" }, { "evidence_use": "Regional withdrawal pattern.", "label": "Al Jazeera: France hands over last bases in Senegal", "type": "public_report", "url": "https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/17/former-colonial-ruler-france-hands-over-its-last-military-bases-in-senegal" }, { "evidence_use": "Independent analysis and reviewer note seed.", "label": "IRIS: end of France–Chad military agreements", "type": "expert_analysis", "url": "https://www.iris-france.org/en/fin-des-accords-militaires-entre-la-france-et-le-tchad-facteurs-et-enjeux-dune-rupture/" }, { "evidence_use": "Civil-society/public sentiment record.", "label": "AP: protests in Chad against French military presence", "type": "public_report", "url": "https://apnews.com/article/0436a6c9a914c0dd007d603e279e44c8" } ], "source_classes": [ "defense agreements, SOFA texts and base records", "CFA/franc-zone monetary documents and public policy records", "official French/African diplomatic communications", "resource contracts and corporate ownership records", "public statements and verified transcripts", "documented pressure, sanctions, interference or destabilization events", "civilian protection and abuse chronology", "right-of-reply and correction records" ], "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Evidence-gated dossier template for reviewing French military, monetary, diplomatic, informational, corporate, intelligence-adjacent and Françafrique-linked pressure patterns affecting African sovereignty and civilian protection.", "target_body": "parliamentary, legal, civil-society, AU/regional and international review channels", "title": "France / Françafrique pressure, military presence and destabilization-risk dossier" }, { "action_objective": "Assess whether foreign logistics, finance, training, mercenary deployment, gold/resource networks or security diplomacy materially increased RSF capacity to commit abuses or prolong conflict.", "country": "Sudan / regional spillover review", "critical_flags": [ "requires legal review", "right-of-reply record missing", "do not publish final sponsorship wording without direct source synthesis" ], "dossier_type": "proxy_conflict_sponsorship_review", "id": "ACTION-UAE-RSF-PROXY-ABUSE-001", "risk_level": "critical", "source_anchors": [ { "evidence_use": "Human-rights report for UAE-linked contractor/RSF support allegations.", "label": "HRW: Colombians linked to atrocities trained in UAE bases", "type": "human_rights_report", "url": "https://www.hrw.org/news/2026/05/25/sudan-colombians-linked-to-atrocities-trained-in-uae-bases" }, { "evidence_use": "Independent report on HRW/UN-linked allegations and denials.", "label": "AP: UAE accused of training Colombian mercenaries for Sudan's war", "type": "news_wire", "url": "https://apnews.com/article/5c02e3b580f01b840251c206673123a7" }, { "evidence_use": "UN reporting index for Sudan sanctions/expert documents.", "label": "UN Security Council Sudan Panel of Experts reports", "type": "UN_document_index", "url": "https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/sanctions/1591/panel-of-experts/reports" } ], "source_classes": [ "UN Panel of Experts reports", "HRW reports", "AP/Reuters/WaPo reporting", "flight/logistics records", "arms-transfer evidence", "RSF atrocity chronology", "UAE official denials/right-of-reply" ], "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Evidence-gated dossier for reviewing UAE-linked allegations around RSF support, mercenary/contractor routes, logistics, arms flows, gold/resource networks and civilian-abuse consequences in Sudan. UAE denials and right-of-reply must be preserved.", "target_body": "AU, UN, parliamentary, sanctions, legal and human-rights review channels", "title": "UAE / RSF support, proxy-conflict and abuse-risk dossier" }, { "action_objective": "Protect African workers and states by mapping labour-abuse risks, recruitment chains, employer accountability, consular protection, investment leverage, soft-power influence and right-of-response records.", "country": "Qatar / African migrant-worker and Africa-facing investment review", "critical_flags": [ "worker identities must be protected", "requires right-of-reply and reform-status review", "do not expose survivor/worker details" ], "dossier_type": "labour_rights_soft_power_investment_review", "id": "ACTION-QATAR-LABOUR-SOFTPOWER-001", "risk_level": "high", "source_anchors": [ { "evidence_use": "Current overview of migrant-worker vulnerability and rights restrictions.", "label": "Amnesty Qatar 2025 human-rights report", "type": "human_rights_report", "url": "https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/middle-east-and-north-africa/middle-east/qatar/report-qatar/" }, { "evidence_use": "Detailed forced-labour and private-security worker abuse report.", "label": "Amnesty: 'They think that we're machines'", "type": "human_rights_report", "url": "https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/mde22/5388/2022/en/" }, { "evidence_use": "Historical labour reform gap and migrant-worker abuse context.", "label": "Amnesty USA: Promising Little, Delivering Less", "type": "human_rights_report", "url": "https://www.amnestyusa.org/reports/promising-little-delivering-less-qatar-and-migrant-labor-abuse-ahead-of-the-2022-football-world-cup/" } ], "source_classes": [ "Amnesty/ILO/human-rights reports", "worker testimonies with redaction", "employment/recruitment records", "consular records", "company responses", "Qatar reform-status documents", "African state labour agreements" ], "status": "template_evidence_to_attach", "summary": "Evidence-gated dossier for labour rights, religious/soft-power influence, investment leverage and security diplomacy involving African states and African workers. It focuses on worker protection, recruitment chains, wage theft, coercion, reform gaps, religious/NGO influence and investment dependencies.", "target_body": "labour-rights, consular, parliamentary, AU, ILO and civil-society channels", "title": "Qatar / labour rights, religious-soft-power and investment leverage dossier" } ]