{ "count": 43, "disclaimer": "Non-state threat profiles are evidence-gated public-output and influence-pattern assessments. They do not reveal contributors or imply membership, informant status, or private affiliation.", "items": [ { "categories": [ "Epstein_adjacent", "elite_impunity", "sex_trafficking_risk", "political_access", "business_access" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "source_linked", "evidence_strength": 70, "flags": [ "do not expose survivor or child-identifying material", "adjacency is not guilt" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 87, "discourse_harm_normalization": 92, "public_influence_reach": 82, "review_completeness": 50, "source_directness": 70 }, "name": "Epstein-adjacent elite influence and exploitation-risk pattern", "patterns": [ "child/survivor protection is absolute", "do not expose victims", "contact is not guilt", "elite access patterns require public scrutiny" ], "profile_class": "public_personality", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-EPSTEIN-ADJACENT-ELITES-001", "risk_score": 92, "source_anchors": [ { "evidence_use": "Africa-focused public reporting.", "label": "Le Monde: Epstein's African connections", "url": "https://www.lemonde.fr/en/le-monde-africa/article/2026/02/16/epstein-s-african-connections-included-presidents-heirs-and-recruiters_6750524_124.html" }, { "evidence_use": "Middle East-focused reporting.", "label": "Reuters: Epstein Middle East network", "url": "https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/epstein-tried-build-web-powerful-ties-across-middle-east-documents-show-2026-02-18/" } ], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern profile for elite figures, financiers, recruiters, political heirs, logistics actors or business networks publicly linked to Epstein documents. The platform separates contact, adjacency, facilitation, alleged exploitation and proven criminal conduct.", "trust_index": 12, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "RSF", "proxy_conflict", "UAE", "Sudan", "war_crimes_risk", "resource_networks" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "UAE / Sudan", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "source_linked", "evidence_strength": 68, "flags": [ "requires legal review", "preserve denials", "source-linked but not final finding" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 85, "discourse_harm_normalization": 90, "public_influence_reach": 80, "review_completeness": 48, "source_directness": 68 }, "name": "UAE / RSF support and proxy-conflict risk pattern", "patterns": [ "RSF atrocities and proxy-support allegations", "gold/resource/logistics network review", "right-of-reply and UN/HRW/AP/WaPo source synthesis required" ], "profile_class": "foundation_philanthropy", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-UAE-RSF-SUPPORT-001", "risk_score": 90, "source_anchors": [ { "evidence_use": "UN sanctions/expert report index.", "label": "UN Sudan Panel of Experts reports", "url": "https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/sanctions/1591/panel-of-experts/reports" }, { "evidence_use": "Human-rights report on alleged UAE-linked training route.", "label": "HRW: Colombians linked to atrocities trained in UAE bases", "url": "https://www.hrw.org/news/2026/05/25/sudan-colombians-linked-to-atrocities-trained-in-uae-bases" }, { "evidence_use": "Independent reporting with allegations and denials.", "label": "AP: UAE accused of training Colombian mercenaries for Sudan's war", "url": "https://apnews.com/article/5c02e3b580f01b840251c206673123a7" } ], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern profile for publicly reported allegations of UAE-linked support, logistics, mercenary networks or resource channels connected to the RSF and Sudan war. It preserves denials and requires legal review before final adverse wording.", "trust_index": 18, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "Epstein_adjacent", "elite_networks", "sex_trafficking_risk", "political_access", "Africa" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "Africa / transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "source_linked", "evidence_strength": 66, "flags": [ "do not publish survivor-identifying material", "contact is not guilt", "requires document-level review" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 83, "discourse_harm_normalization": 88, "public_influence_reach": 78, "review_completeness": 46, "source_directness": 66 }, "name": "Epstein Africa elite-network and exploitation-risk pattern", "patterns": [ "elite introductions and access brokering", "possible exploitation/recruitment risks", "must separate contact, facilitation, allegation and confirmed abuse", "survivor/child protection rules apply" ], "profile_class": "public_personality", "profile_id": "TAP-NETWORK-EPSTEIN-AFRICA-001", "risk_score": 88, "source_anchors": [ { "evidence_use": "Public reporting on Epstein Africa network and named connections.", "label": "Le Monde: Epstein's African connections included presidents, heirs and recruiters", "url": "https://www.lemonde.fr/en/le-monde-africa/article/2026/02/16/epstein-s-african-connections-included-presidents-heirs-and-recruiters_6750524_124.html" }, { "evidence_use": "Middle East network context with Qatar/UAE references.", "label": "Reuters: Epstein tried to build powerful ties across Middle East", "url": "https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/epstein-tried-build-web-powerful-ties-across-middle-east-documents-show-2026-02-18/" } ], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern profile for Epstein-linked elite access, political introductions, financial favors, recruiters and Africa-facing influence networks as reported in public DOJ-file journalism. The profile is designed to protect against elite impunity, not to declare every contact guilty.", "trust_index": 18, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "colonial_apologetics", "imperial_harm_normalization", "grievance_inversion" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "source_linked", "evidence_strength": 55, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 83, "discourse_harm_normalization": 88, "public_influence_reach": 78, "review_completeness": 35, "source_directness": 55 }, "name": "Colonial apologetics / imperial harm-normalization", "patterns": [ "minimizes historical harm despite documented extraction/violence", "frames sovereignty claims as irrational resentment", "treats imperial institutions as neutral while pathologizing African resistance", "requires direct quote/context before naming any living actor" ], "profile_class": "pattern_only", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-COLONIAL-APOLOGETICS-001", "risk_score": 88, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern profile for public arguments that minimize colonial violence, excuse imperial extraction, recast victims as the main cause of harm, or redirect legitimate grievance inward while shielding external power structures.", "trust_index": 20, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "labour_rights", "human_trafficking_risk", "kafala", "African_workers", "forced_labor" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "Gulf / Africa", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "source_linked", "evidence_strength": 72, "flags": [ "worker/survivor identities protected", "human-trafficking claims require specific case records" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 81, "discourse_harm_normalization": 86, "public_influence_reach": 76, "review_completeness": 52, "source_directness": 72 }, "name": "Gulf labour exploitation and trafficking-risk pattern affecting Africans", "patterns": [ "African worker protection priority", "do not expose survivor identities", "state/company reforms must be compared to outcomes", "requires consular, ILO, Amnesty, HRW, court and worker-testimony records" ], "profile_class": "corporate_tech_owner", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-GULF-LABOUR-TRAFFICKING-001", "risk_score": 86, "source_anchors": [ { "evidence_use": "Qatar migrant-worker risk overview.", "label": "Amnesty Qatar 2025 report", "url": "https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/middle-east-and-north-africa/middle-east/qatar/report-qatar/" }, { "evidence_use": "Detailed forced-labour report.", "label": "Amnesty: forced labour and abuse in Qatar private security sector", "url": "https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/mde22/5388/2022/en/" } ], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern profile for migrant-worker abuse, forced-labour indicators, recruitment debt, passport retention, wage theft, sexual exploitation, domestic-worker abuse and weak remedy channels affecting Africans in Gulf labour markets.", "trust_index": 18, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "Epstein_adjacent", "DP_World", "ports", "Africa_logistics", "elite_networks" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "UAE / transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "source_linked", "evidence_strength": 68, "flags": [ "Epstein adjacency is not proof of trafficking", "right-of-response needed" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 77, "discourse_harm_normalization": 82, "public_influence_reach": 72, "review_completeness": 48, "source_directness": 68 }, "name": "Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem / Epstein-adjacent infrastructure-governance profile", "patterns": [ "extensive Epstein correspondence reported", "port/infrastructure influence across Africa raises governance stakes", "requires right-of-reply and separation of reputational, governance and criminal questions" ], "profile_class": "public_personality", "profile_id": "TAP-PERSON-SULTAN-BIN-SULAYEM-EPSTEIN-001", "risk_score": 82, "source_anchors": [ { "evidence_use": "Public reporting on bin Sulayem and DP World governance fallout.", "label": "Le Monde: Epstein files and bin Sulayem", "url": "https://www.lemonde.fr/en/economy/article/2026/02/18/epstein-files-the-fall-of-sultan-ahmed-bin-sulayem-architect-of-the-uae-s-port-empire_6750609_19.html" }, { "evidence_use": "Reuters reporting on Epstein network documents.", "label": "Reuters: Epstein Middle East network", "url": "https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/epstein-tried-build-web-powerful-ties-across-middle-east-documents-show-2026-02-18/" } ], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Public-personality and infrastructure-governance risk profile based on reporting about extensive Epstein correspondence and DP World leadership fallout. The profile treats the issue as elite-network, port-power and due-diligence risk; it does not assert trafficking conduct absent evidence.", "trust_index": 22, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "critical_minerals", "CIA_adjacent_personnel", "cobalt", "resource_capture", "DRC", "strategic_acquisition" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "United States / DRC", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "source_linked", "evidence_strength": 58, "flags": [ "CIA-adjacent personnel indicator, not proof of covert operation", "contract/beneficial ownership evidence needed", "high sovereign-mineral scrutiny" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 77, "discourse_harm_normalization": 82, "public_influence_reach": 72, "review_completeness": 38, "source_directness": 58 }, "name": "Virtus Minerals / U.S. critical-minerals acquisition risk profile", "patterns": [ "critical mineral acquisition with strategic-state relevance", "former CIA/intelligence career of key personnel is an influence-risk indicator, not proof of covert control", "requires contract terms, beneficial ownership, financing, local value-add and Congolese right-of-reply" ], "profile_class": "corporate_tech_owner", "profile_id": "TAP-BUSINESS-VIRTUS-MINERALS-001", "risk_score": 82, "source_anchors": [ { "evidence_use": "Public article snippet references Virtus president Gregory Roberts' CIA background and Congo minerals deal.", "label": "Africa Confidential: The Americans are buying", "url": "https://www.africa-confidential.com/article/id/15944/the-americans-are-buying" }, { "evidence_use": "Public reporting on Virtus Minerals acquisition of Chemaf assets.", "label": "Le Monde: U.S. company secures huge DRC copper/cobalt deal", "url": "https://www.lemonde.fr/en/le-monde-africa/article/2026/04/04/in-the-democratic-republic-of-congo-a-us-company-secures-a-huge-deal-by-acquiring-copper-and-cobalt-mines_6752101_124.html" } ], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Corporate risk profile for U.S. critical-minerals acquisition activity in the DRC, especially where former intelligence or national-security personnel, strategic minerals policy, debt leverage, sanctions context or opaque deal structures affect Congolese sovereign capability.", "trust_index": 24, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "biobank", "genomic_sovereignty", "data_extraction" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "source_linked", "evidence_strength": 45, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 77, "discourse_harm_normalization": 82, "public_influence_reach": 72, "review_completeness": 25, "source_directness": 45 }, "name": "Biobank/genomic extraction pattern", "patterns": [ "sample custody externalization", "benefit sharing unclear", "requires contracts/ethics approvals/public records" ], "profile_class": "corporate_tech_owner", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-BIOBANK-GENOMIC-EXTRACTION-001", "risk_score": 82, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern for extracting samples, genomes, pathogen data or biobank value without enforceable African custody, benefit sharing and scientific leadership.", "trust_index": 24, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "CIA_adjacent", "strategic_assets", "critical_infrastructure", "minerals", "data", "security_state" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "United States / transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "source_linked", "evidence_strength": 52, "flags": [ "pattern profile, not individual guilt", "requires deal-specific evidence" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 75, "discourse_harm_normalization": 80, "public_influence_reach": 70, "review_completeness": 32, "source_directness": 52 }, "name": "CIA/intelligence-adjacent corporate acquisition pattern", "patterns": [ "former intelligence employment is not guilt but raises due-diligence duties", "strategic assets require local control, audit, exit rights and data/resource sovereignty", "requires ownership, contract, financing and public-interest review" ], "profile_class": "corporate_tech_owner", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-CIA-ADJACENT-CORPORATE-001", "risk_score": 80, "source_anchors": [ { "evidence_use": "CIA-linked venture nonprofit ecosystem context.", "label": "In-Q-Tel official site", "url": "https://www.iqt.org/" }, { "evidence_use": "Official CIA context for venture/technology linkages.", "label": "CIA: In-Q-Tel historical/official context", "url": "https://www.cia.gov/stories/story/in-q-tel/" } ], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern profile for businesses where former intelligence officials, national-security contractors or intelligence-linked investment ecosystems enter African critical minerals, ports, telecoms, AI, data, health, energy or security infrastructure.", "trust_index": 26, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "ports", "logistics", "Gulf_leverage", "debt", "resource_corridors", "security_diplomacy" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "UAE/Qatar/Saudi / Africa", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "source_linked", "evidence_strength": 48, "flags": [ "pattern profile", "contract-specific review needed" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 73, "discourse_harm_normalization": 78, "public_influence_reach": 68, "review_completeness": 28, "source_directness": 48 }, "name": "Gulf ports/logistics leverage pattern in African states", "patterns": [ "port concessions and logistics chokepoints", "sovereign wealth / elite-deal opacity", "security diplomacy linked to investment", "requires contract, debt, labour and arbitration data" ], "profile_class": "corporate_tech_owner", "profile_id": "TAP-BUSINESS-GULF-PORTS-LOGISTICS-001", "risk_score": 78, "source_anchors": [ { "evidence_use": "Corporate footprint reference; not adverse evidence by itself.", "label": "DP World official Africa page", "url": "https://www.dpworld.com/africa" } ], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern profile for Gulf-linked ports, logistics corridors, free zones, sovereign wealth, security diplomacy and debt/investment leverage that may support infrastructure but can also create strategic dependency or elite capture.", "trust_index": 30, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "terrorism_support_allegations", "Gulf", "Africa_spillover", "proxy_networks", "review_required" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "Gulf / Middle East / Africa", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 44, "flags": [ "allegation-sensitive", "requires direct case files" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 73, "discourse_harm_normalization": 78, "public_influence_reach": 68, "review_completeness": 24, "source_directness": 44 }, "name": "Middle East terrorism-support accusation and African spillover review pattern", "patterns": [ "terrorism-support allegations require direct sources", "separate state policy, charity diversion, private financier and propaganda claims", "review sanctions, court records, UN reports and official denials" ], "profile_class": "think_tank_policy", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-MIDDLE-EAST-TERRORISM-ACCUSATION-001", "risk_score": 78, "source_anchors": [ { "evidence_use": "Primary sanctions-list reference point.", "label": "UN Security Council sanctions list portal", "url": "https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/sanctions/information" } ], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern profile for states, charities, elite networks, logistics firms or financiers publicly accused of supporting extremist groups, proxy actors or conflict networks with African spillover. Use only with case-specific evidence; do not generalize allegations to populations or ordinary businesses.", "trust_index": 26, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "security_tutelage", "policy_capture", "anti_sovereignty" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 42, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 73, "discourse_harm_normalization": 78, "public_influence_reach": 68, "review_completeness": 22, "source_directness": 42 }, "name": "Security think-tank tutelage discourse", "patterns": [ "permanent tutelage framed as realism", "local accountability treated as obstacle", "requires report/funding/author/source linkage" ], "profile_class": "think_tank_policy", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-THINK-TANK-SECURITY-TUTELAGE-001", "risk_score": 78, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern for think-tank outputs that frame African security as requiring permanent foreign command, bases, training dependency or immunity clauses while minimizing civilian-protection and sovereignty costs.", "trust_index": 28, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "Epstein_adjacent", "ports", "UAE", "Africa_logistics", "elite_networks", "governance_risk" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "UAE / transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "source_linked", "evidence_strength": 64, "flags": [ "Epstein adjacency is not proof of trafficking", "right-of-response needed", "port/infrastructure influence risk" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 71, "discourse_harm_normalization": 76, "public_influence_reach": 66, "review_completeness": 44, "source_directness": 64 }, "name": "DP World / Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem Epstein-adjacent governance-risk profile", "patterns": [ "Epstein-file adjacency is a governance-risk indicator", "no public evidence in attached sources of direct trafficking by DP World", "Africa-facing ports/logistics networks require heightened due diligence and right-of-response" ], "profile_class": "corporate_tech_owner", "profile_id": "TAP-BUSINESS-DP-WORLD-EPSTEIN-ADJACENCY-001", "risk_score": 76, "source_anchors": [ { "evidence_use": "Public reporting on Epstein Middle East network efforts and DP World leadership fallout.", "label": "Reuters: Epstein tried to build powerful ties across Middle East", "url": "https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/epstein-tried-build-web-powerful-ties-across-middle-east-documents-show-2026-02-18/" }, { "evidence_use": "Public reporting on bin Sulayem/DP World governance fallout.", "label": "Le Monde: Epstein files and Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem", "url": "https://www.lemonde.fr/en/economy/article/2026/02/18/epstein-files-the-fall-of-sultan-ahmed-bin-sulayem-architect-of-the-uae-s-port-empire_6750609_19.html" } ], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Corporate/elite-network risk profile based on public reporting that Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, former DP World leader, was heavily implicated in Epstein-file correspondence. The profile does not assert trafficking participation; it treats elite proximity, inappropriate communications, port/infrastructure power and Africa-facing logistics leverage as governance and due-diligence risks.", "trust_index": 28, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "media_capture", "sahel", "sovereignty_delegitimation" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 44, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 71, "discourse_harm_normalization": 76, "public_influence_reach": 66, "review_completeness": 24, "source_directness": 44 }, "name": "Sahel sovereignty delegitimation media pattern", "patterns": [ "ridicules sovereignty claims", "omits base/SOFA accountability", "requires article/transcript chronology" ], "profile_class": "journalist_media", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-JOURNALIST-SAHEL-DELEGITIMATION-001", "risk_score": 76, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern for journalism that delegitimizes African rejection of foreign military tutelage while underreporting civilian-protection failures or agreement clauses.", "trust_index": 30, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "private_intelligence", "state_capture", "security" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 40, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 70, "discourse_harm_normalization": 75, "public_influence_reach": 65, "review_completeness": 20, "source_directness": 40 }, "name": "Private intelligence consultancy influence pattern", "patterns": [ "opaque intelligence services", "policy or security capture", "requires contracts, leaks, court or official records" ], "profile_class": "think_tank_policy", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-PRIVATE-INTELLIGENCE-CONSULTANCY-001", "risk_score": 75, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern where private intelligence, risk or security consultancies shape African state decisions, opposition targeting, contracts or narratives without public accountability.", "trust_index": 28, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "NED_adjacent", "civil_society_capture", "soft_power", "media_training", "political_conditioning" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "United States / transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "source_linked", "evidence_strength": 62, "flags": [ "adjacency is not guilt", "requires recipient-specific review", "right-of-response needed before naming local actors" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 69, "discourse_harm_normalization": 74, "public_influence_reach": 64, "review_completeness": 42, "source_directness": 62 }, "name": "NED-adjacent influence and civil-society capture pattern", "patterns": [ "public grants and training may create dependency or agenda alignment", "not all recipients are capture actors", "requires grant records, program documents, recipient response and local impact review", "useful civic work and influence risk can coexist" ], "profile_class": "foundation_philanthropy", "profile_id": "TAP-NETWORK-NED-ADJACENT-INFLUENCE-001", "risk_score": 74, "source_anchors": [ { "evidence_use": "Public grant source for recipient/network mapping.", "label": "NED Africa region and grant listings", "url": "https://www.ned.org/region/africa-3/" }, { "evidence_use": "Public grant listing; requires case-by-case interpretation.", "label": "NED FY2024 Africa grant listing PDF", "url": "https://www.ned.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Africa-Grant-Listing-FY24.pdf" } ], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern profile for public funding, training or grant networks that can strengthen civic capacity but can also redirect political agendas, media priorities or sovereignty debates toward U.S.-aligned policy frames. The assessment separates open grants from covert control, and treats each local recipient case separately.", "trust_index": 32, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "media_capture", "psychological_pressure", "narrative_inversion" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "source_linked", "evidence_strength": 48, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 69, "discourse_harm_normalization": 74, "public_influence_reach": 64, "review_completeness": 28, "source_directness": 48 }, "name": "Media grievance-inversion narrative", "patterns": [ "selective omission of external constraints", "ridicule of sovereignty claims", "amplification of elite-friendly explanations", "requires article/transcript/video excerpt evidence" ], "profile_class": "journalist_media", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-MEDIA-GRIEVANCE-INVERSION-001", "risk_score": 74, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern profile for media narratives that convert external pressure, extraction, sanctions or military interference into a story that Africans alone caused their deprivation or instability.", "trust_index": 30, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "public_health", "philanthropy", "agenda_capture" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 44, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 69, "discourse_harm_normalization": 74, "public_influence_reach": 64, "review_completeness": 24, "source_directness": 44 }, "name": "Philanthropic public-health capture pattern", "patterns": [ "agenda setting without local control", "sample/data custody concern", "requires grant/MOU/ethics/source pack" ], "profile_class": "foundation_philanthropy", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-PHILANTHROPIC-HEALTH-CAPTURE-001", "risk_score": 74, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern for donors/foundations shaping African health priorities, data custody, labs, trials or procurement without local democratic/scientific control.", "trust_index": 32, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "data_sovereignty", "ai_extraction", "cloud_dependency" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "source_linked", "evidence_strength": 45, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 67, "discourse_harm_normalization": 72, "public_influence_reach": 62, "review_completeness": 25, "source_directness": 45 }, "name": "Tech/data extraction without African control", "patterns": [ "data extraction without local governance", "cloud lock-in", "AI model value without fair capability return", "requires contract/DPA/architecture evidence" ], "profile_class": "corporate_tech_owner", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-TECH-DATA-EXTRACTION-001", "risk_score": 72, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern profile for platforms, vendors or tech owners that extract African data, behavioral intelligence, infrastructure lock-in or AI value without local ownership, auditability, data residency or capability transfer.", "trust_index": 34, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "consultancy_capture", "state_reform", "policy_dependency" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 40, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 67, "discourse_harm_normalization": 72, "public_influence_reach": 62, "review_completeness": 20, "source_directness": 40 }, "name": "Consultancy-led state reform capture pattern", "patterns": [ "reform templates imported", "procurement opacity", "requires contracts, deliverables and cost evidence" ], "profile_class": "corporate_tech_owner", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-CONSULTANCY-STATE-CAPTURE-001", "risk_score": 72, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern for foreign consultancies shaping reforms, procurement, digital government or economic policy without public audit, transfer or local maintenance capability.", "trust_index": 30, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "colonial_nostalgia", "media_capture", "prestige_discourse" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 38, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 67, "discourse_harm_normalization": 72, "public_influence_reach": 62, "review_completeness": 18, "source_directness": 38 }, "name": "Elite journal colonial nostalgia pattern", "patterns": [ "romanticizes colonial order", "omits extraction and violence", "requires article corpus and historian review" ], "profile_class": "journalist_media", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-ELITE-JOURNAL-COLONIAL-NOSTALGIA-001", "risk_score": 72, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern for prestigious outlets that romanticize colonial administration, minimize extraction, or frame anti-colonial sovereignty as irrational instability.", "trust_index": 30, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "Epstein_adjacent", "elite_access", "Senegal", "political_family", "review_required" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "Senegal / transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "source_linked", "evidence_strength": 58, "flags": [ "Epstein adjacency is not proof of criminal wrongdoing", "right-of-response missing", "review before adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 65, "discourse_harm_normalization": 70, "public_influence_reach": 60, "review_completeness": 38, "source_directness": 58 }, "name": "Karim Wade / Epstein Africa access-adjacency profile", "patterns": [ "elite access facilitation alleged/reported", "requires DOJ-document review and right-of-response", "separate political network facilitation from abuse allegations" ], "profile_class": "public_personality", "profile_id": "TAP-PERSON-KARIM-WADE-EPSTEIN-001", "risk_score": 70, "source_anchors": [ { "evidence_use": "Public reporting on Karim Wade/Epstein Africa access.", "label": "Le Monde: Epstein's African connections", "url": "https://www.lemonde.fr/en/le-monde-africa/article/2026/02/16/epstein-s-african-connections-included-presidents-heirs-and-recruiters_6750524_124.html" } ], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Public-personality risk profile based on reporting that Karim Wade facilitated Epstein's travels and meetings with African heads of state. This is an access-adjacency and influence-risk profile, not a finding of trafficking or criminal conduct.", "trust_index": 30, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "audit_washing", "mining", "ESG" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 42, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 65, "discourse_harm_normalization": 70, "public_influence_reach": 60, "review_completeness": 22, "source_directness": 42 }, "name": "Supply-chain audit washing pattern", "patterns": [ "audit substitutes for remedy", "community harm ignored", "requires audit method and counter-evidence" ], "profile_class": "corporate_tech_owner", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-SUPPLY-CHAIN-AUDITOR-WASHING-001", "risk_score": 70, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern where audit labels or ESG reports sanitize harmful supply chains without worker/community remedy, traceability, local value or independent verification.", "trust_index": 32, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "academic_capture", "grievance_inversion", "colonial_apologetics" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 40, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 65, "discourse_harm_normalization": 70, "public_influence_reach": 60, "review_completeness": 20, "source_directness": 40 }, "name": "Academic deflection of external responsibility", "patterns": [ "selective causality", "omits treaty/resource/monetary constraints", "requires DOI/quote/context" ], "profile_class": "academic_author", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-ACADEMIC-DEFLECTION-001", "risk_score": 70, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern for academic work that converts colonial, military, monetary or corporate pressure into internal blame without proportionate treatment of external constraints.", "trust_index": 30, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "ai_ethics", "data_sovereignty", "epistemic_capture" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 38, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 63, "discourse_harm_normalization": 68, "public_influence_reach": 58, "review_completeness": 18, "source_directness": 38 }, "name": "AI ethics without African ownership pattern", "patterns": [ "ethics without infrastructure transfer", "extractive consultation", "requires DOI/funding/project evidence" ], "profile_class": "academic_author", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-AI-ETHICS-WITHOUT-OWNERSHIP-001", "risk_score": 68, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern where AI ethics discourse discusses African harms while leaving compute, datasets, models and governance under external ownership.", "trust_index": 34, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "climate_finance", "debt", "green_capture" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 38, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 63, "discourse_harm_normalization": 68, "public_influence_reach": 58, "review_completeness": 18, "source_directness": 38 }, "name": "Climate finance debt-normalization pattern", "patterns": [ "adaptation converted into debt", "carbon rights externalized", "requires finance terms and beneficiary analysis" ], "profile_class": "think_tank_policy", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-CLIMATE-FINANCE-DEBT-TRAP-001", "risk_score": 68, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern where climate finance packages increase debt, external control or carbon-market extraction without real adaptation capacity or reparations.", "trust_index": 34, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "influencer", "soft_power", "colonized_discourse" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 35, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 63, "discourse_harm_normalization": 68, "public_influence_reach": 58, "review_completeness": 15, "source_directness": 35 }, "name": "Influencer anti-sovereignty normalization", "patterns": [ "virality over evidence", "dependency framed as maturity", "sovereign repair framed as extremism", "named assessment requires source pack and reviewer approval" ], "profile_class": "influencer_commentator", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-INFLUENCER-ANTI-SOVEREIGNTY-001", "risk_score": 68, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Starter pattern for public personalities who normalize dependency, mock sovereign capability-building, or market foreign tutelage as realism without measurable evidence of transfer or protection.", "trust_index": 32, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "legal_commentary", "lawfare", "sovereignty_delegitimation" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 36, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 61, "discourse_harm_normalization": 66, "public_influence_reach": 56, "review_completeness": 16, "source_directness": 36 }, "name": "Imperial legal commentary laundering pattern", "patterns": [ "external law treated as neutral", "African remedy framed as disorder", "requires article/brief/transcript evidence" ], "profile_class": "academic_author", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-IMPERIAL-LEGAL-COMMENTARY-001", "risk_score": 66, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern where legal commentary frames African sovereignty measures as illegitimate while normalizing external coercive law, sanctions or immunity structures.", "trust_index": 36, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "digital_sovereignty", "platform_power", "information_control" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 35, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 60, "discourse_harm_normalization": 65, "public_influence_reach": 55, "review_completeness": 15, "source_directness": 35 }, "name": "Platform moderation / censorship sovereignty risk", "patterns": [ "foreign policy-aligned moderation risk", "activist exposure risk", "requires policy/actions/case log" ], "profile_class": "platform_or_channel", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-PLATFORM-CENSORSHIP-SOVEREIGNTY-001", "risk_score": 65, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern for platforms whose content governance, demonetization or moderation can suppress African sovereignty discourse or expose activists without local accountability.", "trust_index": 36, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "Epstein_adjacent", "Qatar", "political_advice", "elite_networks", "review_required" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "Qatar / transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "source_linked", "evidence_strength": 56, "flags": [ "adjacency is not guilt", "right-of-response missing" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 59, "discourse_harm_normalization": 64, "public_influence_reach": 54, "review_completeness": 36, "source_directness": 56 }, "name": "Sheikh Jabor Yousuf Jassim Al Thani / Epstein Qatar-advisory adjacency profile", "patterns": [ "Epstein attempted political advice during blockade", "Qatar-related diplomacy and elite access", "requires document-level review and right-of-response" ], "profile_class": "public_personality", "profile_id": "TAP-PERSON-SHEIKH-JABOR-AL-THANI-EPSTEIN-001", "risk_score": 64, "source_anchors": [ { "evidence_use": "Reuters reporting on Qatar-related Epstein communications.", "label": "Reuters: Epstein ties across Middle East", "url": "https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/epstein-tried-build-web-powerful-ties-across-middle-east-documents-show-2026-02-18/" } ], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Public-personality profile based on Reuters reporting that Epstein exchanged advice with a Qatari businessman and ruling-family member during the Gulf blockade. This is an influence-adjacency profile and not a criminal finding.", "trust_index": 38, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "development_economics", "industrial_policy", "dependency" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 36, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 58, "discourse_harm_normalization": 63, "public_influence_reach": 53, "review_completeness": 16, "source_directness": 36 }, "name": "Development economist anti-industrialization pattern", "patterns": [ "anti-industrial policy bias", "local value retention minimized", "requires DOI/report and policy outcome evidence" ], "profile_class": "academic_author", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-DEVELOPMENT-ECONOMIST-ANTI-INDUSTRIALIZATION-001", "risk_score": 63, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern where policy advice discourages local industry, public ownership, technology transfer or value retention while promoting extractive openness.", "trust_index": 38, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "academic_dependency", "ranking_dependency", "epistemic_capture" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 42, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 57, "discourse_harm_normalization": 62, "public_influence_reach": 52, "review_completeness": 22, "source_directness": 42 }, "name": "Prestige academia without sovereign capability transfer", "patterns": [ "publication prestige without institutional capability transfer", "external ranking dependency", "grant agendas that displace local priorities", "requires DOI/grant/institutional source linkage" ], "profile_class": "academic_author", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-PRESTIGE-ACADEMIA-CAPTURE-001", "risk_score": 62, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern profile for academic prestige systems that extract data, legitimacy or talent while producing little measurable local capability, infrastructure, curriculum sovereignty or maintenance ownership.", "trust_index": 38, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "ngo_capture", "selective_pressure", "lawfare" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 38, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 57, "discourse_harm_normalization": 62, "public_influence_reach": 52, "review_completeness": 18, "source_directness": 38 }, "name": "Selective human-rights NGO pressure pattern", "patterns": [ "selective evidence emphasis", "funding and agenda transparency needed", "requires report comparison and funding record" ], "profile_class": "think_tank_policy", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-NGO-HUMAN-RIGHTS-SELECTIVITY-001", "risk_score": 62, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern where rights language is applied selectively to discipline anti-imperial states while minimizing harms by sponsor-aligned actors.", "trust_index": 38, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "influencer", "elite_capture", "consumerist_dependency" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 32, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 56, "discourse_harm_normalization": 61, "public_influence_reach": 51, "review_completeness": 12, "source_directness": 32 }, "name": "Elite aspirational capture influencer pattern", "patterns": [ "mocks local institution-building", "celebrates external validation", "requires public posts/video metadata" ], "profile_class": "influencer_commentator", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-INFLUENCER-ELITE-ASPIRATIONAL-CAPTURE-001", "risk_score": 61, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern where influencers normalize dependency, luxury politics, foreign validation and anti-institutional cynicism while discouraging concrete sovereign capability-building.", "trust_index": 38, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "ranking_dependency", "university_capture", "prestige_without_capability" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 36, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 55, "discourse_harm_normalization": 60, "public_influence_reach": 50, "review_completeness": 16, "source_directness": 36 }, "name": "University ranking agency capture pattern", "patterns": [ "prestige indicators displace utility", "external metric dependency", "requires ranking methodology review" ], "profile_class": "think_tank_policy", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-RANKING-AGENCY-CAPTURE-001", "risk_score": 60, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern where ranking systems push African universities toward prestige metrics instead of useful science, patents, local capability and public service.", "trust_index": 38, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "Atlas_Network_adjacent", "free_market_policy", "regulatory_reform", "think_tank_network", "contested_constructive" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "United States / transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "source_linked", "evidence_strength": 60, "flags": [ "contested influence profile", "not automatically hostile", "score depends on policy outputs and capability effects" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 53, "discourse_harm_normalization": 58, "public_influence_reach": 48, "review_completeness": 40, "source_directness": 60 }, "name": "Atlas Network / free-market policy influence pattern", "patterns": [ "enterprise and anti-bureaucracy contributions may be constructive", "risk appears when public capability, labour protection, health, land or resources are subordinated to market ideology", "named actors require source-linked role and output review" ], "profile_class": "think_tank_policy", "profile_id": "TAP-NETWORK-ATLAS-FREE-MARKET-001", "risk_score": 58, "source_anchors": [ { "evidence_use": "Public Atlas page describing the center and Magatte Wade's director role.", "label": "Atlas Network Center for African Prosperity", "url": "https://www.atlasnetwork.org/partners/center-for-african-prosperity" }, { "evidence_use": "Public event/activity record.", "label": "Atlas Network event article with Magatte Wade", "url": "https://www.atlasnetwork.org/articles/remaking-african-institutions-to-foster-entrepreneurship-at-africalf21" } ], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern profile for Atlas Network-linked free-market policy advocacy. It can support entrepreneurship, anti-bureaucracy and enterprise freedom, while also requiring review for donor influence, privatization pressure, weakening of public goods, or narratives that understate colonial/resource constraints.", "trust_index": 48, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "media_capture", "selective_focus", "resource_discourse" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 35, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 53, "discourse_harm_normalization": 58, "public_influence_reach": 48, "review_completeness": 15, "source_directness": 35 }, "name": "China-only distraction narrative", "patterns": [ "selective external blame", "erases France/US/UK/Gulf corporate histories", "requires article corpus" ], "profile_class": "journalist_media", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-MEDIA-CHINA-ONLY-DISRUPTION-001", "risk_score": 58, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern that discusses China as the only external risk while erasing older Western, Gulf, commodity-trading or corporate-state capture patterns.", "trust_index": 40, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "media_platform", "militarization", "soft_power" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 30, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 53, "discourse_harm_normalization": 58, "public_influence_reach": 48, "review_completeness": 10, "source_directness": 30 }, "name": "Security podcast militarization narrative", "patterns": [ "military solution bias", "civilian harm omitted", "requires episode transcript and sponsorship review" ], "profile_class": "platform_or_channel", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-SECURITY-PODCAST-MILITARIZATION-001", "risk_score": 58, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern for podcasts/channels that normalize permanent foreign security presence while omitting accountability, civilian harm or exit conditions.", "trust_index": 42, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "religious_soft_power", "political_influence", "education" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 34, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 52, "discourse_harm_normalization": 57, "public_influence_reach": 47, "review_completeness": 14, "source_directness": 34 }, "name": "Foreign religious sponsorship and political influence pattern", "patterns": [ "foreign funding opaque", "education/politics influenced", "requires funding/institutional records" ], "profile_class": "foundation_philanthropy", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-RELIGIOUS-FOREIGN-SPONSORSHIP-001", "risk_score": 57, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern where foreign religious funding shapes schools, parties, public morality, land or security discourse in ways that weaken civic sovereignty or social repair.", "trust_index": 42, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "publishing", "knowledge_sovereignty", "access" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 34, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 50, "discourse_harm_normalization": 55, "public_influence_reach": 45, "review_completeness": 14, "source_directness": 34 }, "name": "Academic publisher gatekeeping risk", "patterns": [ "paywall/access barrier", "metric dependency", "requires publisher policy/cost/output evidence" ], "profile_class": "platform_or_channel", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-PUBLISHER-GATEKEEPING-001", "risk_score": 55, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern for paywalled or externally governed publishing systems that extract African research value and constrain access, metrics and citation power.", "trust_index": 42, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "fact_checking", "information_pressure", "asymmetry" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 32, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 50, "discourse_harm_normalization": 55, "public_influence_reach": 45, "review_completeness": 12, "source_directness": 32 }, "name": "Asymmetric fact-checking pressure pattern", "patterns": [ "selective target choice", "official sources over-trusted", "requires correction corpus and funding transparency" ], "profile_class": "journalist_media", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-FACTCHECKER-ASYMMETRIC-SCRUTINY-001", "risk_score": 55, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern where fact-checking targets anti-imperial claims aggressively but under-scrutinizes official Western/Gulf/corporate narratives or treaty omissions.", "trust_index": 44, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "culture", "soft_power", "identity_capture" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "transnational", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "starter_profile", "evidence_strength": 28, "flags": [ "starter profile", "requires source-linked public record before hard adverse wording" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 45, "discourse_harm_normalization": 50, "public_influence_reach": 40, "review_completeness": 8, "source_directness": 28 }, "name": "Culture-industry soft-power capture pattern", "patterns": [ "visibility replaces capability", "foreign validation substituted for institution-building", "requires funding/platform/source evidence" ], "profile_class": "influencer_commentator", "profile_id": "TAP-PATTERN-CULTURE-INDUSTRY-SOFT-POWER-001", "risk_score": 50, "source_anchors": [], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Pattern where entertainment, awards, media visibility or cultural patronage detach African identity from sovereignty, language, memory and institutional repair.", "trust_index": 46, "visibility": "public" }, { "categories": [ "entrepreneurship", "African_prosperity", "Atlas_Network_adjacent", "anti_aid", "contested_positive" ], "correction_pathway": "Affected public actors, institutions or publishers may submit corrections, missing context, counter-evidence, or response material. CSSP does not expose who contributes to a review.", "country": "Senegal / United States", "disclaimer": "Evidence-gated non-state threat profile. It assesses public outputs, roles and influence patterns, not private identity or ordinary audience members.", "entity_type": "non_state_threat_profile", "evidence_state": "source_linked", "evidence_strength": 62, "flags": [ "constructive/contested profile", "not a hostile profile", "include positive output and network-adjacency context" ], "metrics": { "capability_harm_relevance": 27, "discourse_harm_normalization": 32, "public_influence_reach": 22, "review_completeness": 42, "source_directness": 62 }, "name": "Magatte Wade — entrepreneurship / Atlas-adjacent contested-positive profile", "patterns": [ "positive: entrepreneurship, dignity, anti-pity framing, African enterprise", "risk: free-market policy network adjacency and possible underweighting of colonial/resource constraints", "assessment should compare public outputs with measurable African capability transfer" ], "profile_class": "public_personality", "profile_id": "TAP-PERSON-MAGATTE-WADE-001", "risk_score": 32, "source_anchors": [ { "evidence_use": "Self-description, book and public thesis.", "label": "Magatte Wade official site", "url": "https://www.magattewade.com/" }, { "evidence_use": "Public role and institutional context.", "label": "Atlas Network Center for African Prosperity", "url": "https://www.atlasnetwork.org/partners/center-for-african-prosperity" }, { "evidence_use": "Public policy framing and interview source.", "label": "Reason interview/profile", "url": "https://reason.com/2024/03/10/magatte-wade-on-african-entrepreneurship/" } ], "source_needs": [ "DOI, ISBN, archive URL or stable publication URL", "public statement, verified transcript or video excerpt metadata", "institutional affiliation and funding/source-of-support record where relevant", "direct quotation or accurate paraphrase with context", "affected capability metric: safety, security, health, knowledge, land, resource, data or dignity", "counter-evidence, correction or response record where relevant", "reviewer note distinguishing opinion, pattern, allegation and confirmed public record" ], "status": "published", "summary": "Public entrepreneur and African prosperity advocate profile. The profile is included to contrast capability-building and contested policy influence: Wade’s anti-pity, entrepreneurship and anti-bureaucracy message can support African agency, while Atlas/free-market adjacency requires review where policy prescriptions affect public goods, labour, land, resources or state capacity.", "trust_index": 64, "visibility": "public" } ], "policy": { "classes": [ "journalist_media", "academic_author", "influencer_commentator", "think_tank_policy", "corporate_tech_owner", "foundation_philanthropy", "public_personality", "platform_or_channel", "pattern_only" ], "evidence_rule": "Adverse public profiles require source-linked evidence: DOI/ISBN/URL, transcript, publication record, funding source, institutional role, video excerpt metadata, reviewer note and correction record where applicable.", "publication_rule": "Public output must separate pattern, cited public statement/work, funding or affiliation, measurable impact, uncertainty and correction pathway. No profile may imply participation in CSSP or source identity.", "purpose": "Separate media, academic, author, influencer, think-tank, corporate and philanthropic threat vectors from foreign-state profiles.", "schema": "cssp-threat-actor-profile-policy-v1", "scope": "This module assesses public conduct, public outputs, institutional roles, financing, discourse patterns and documented influence vectors. It does not infer private motive, secret membership, ethnicity, nationality, or protected identity.", "title": "Non-state threat actor profiles" }, "schema": "cssp-threat-actor-profiles-v1" }