{
  "bad_faith_disqualifiers": [
    "threats or intimidation",
    "pressure without evidence",
    "bribery or inducement",
    "witness exposure",
    "doxxing or sensitive-location exposure",
    "fraudulent documents",
    "bot pressure or coordinated manipulation",
    "reputation laundering",
    "legal threats used to suppress public-interest evidence",
    "attempts to identify protected contributors"
  ],
  "schema": "paso-trust-building-process-v1",
  "steps": [
    {
      "description": "A public source, report, pattern, academic source, legal text, media item or protected contribution identifies a possible capability, risk or correction need.",
      "step": 1,
      "title": "Signal received"
    },
    {
      "description": "The material is checked for safety, public status, source-protection risk, witness exposure, sensitive locations and legal sensitivity.",
      "step": 2,
      "title": "Source and safety screening"
    },
    {
      "description": "The item is classified as signal, allegation, documented event, pattern inference, recommendation, confirmed finding or sealed/internal record.",
      "step": 3,
      "title": "Evidence classification"
    },
    {
      "description": "A provisional score is drafted using the relevant framework: capability, threat, media, university, state, constitutional risk or knowledge-source value.",
      "step": 4,
      "title": "Draft scoring"
    },
    {
      "description": "Human review checks source quality, proportionality, uncertainty, public-interest value, legal exposure and correction pathway.",
      "step": 5,
      "title": "Reviewer check"
    },
    {
      "description": "Good-faith correction, documentary evidence and methodological objections can change, suspend, strengthen or remove a public record.",
      "step": 6,
      "title": "Right of response / correction pathway"
    },
    {
      "description": "Only sanitized, public-safe records are exported. Raw evidence, protected contributors, sealed details and witness identifiers stay out of the public layer.",
      "step": 7,
      "title": "Publication or withholding"
    },
    {
      "description": "Material updates should record what changed, why it changed, what evidence changed and what remains uncertain.",
      "step": 8,
      "title": "Changelog and accountability"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "PASO does not ask visitors to trust a score blindly. It shows how a signal becomes a record, how evidence is classified, how review works, and how correction remains open.",
  "title": "How PASO turns signals into public trust records"
}